[CPWG] SAC 109

[Evin Erdogdu]

Dear All,


Further to the SSAC paper below, please see the SSAC slide deck from the "At-Large Policy Session - DoH/DoT - Threats and Challenges" during the Virtual ICANN67:


https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tT3S5ppZ7AJTC_Mo-XpJZJ8P9EBuloDnk1RBtqxt74A/edit#slide=id.g7e6fce402e_0_4


Kind Regards,

Evin

________________________________
From: Evin Erdogdu
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 7:30 PM
To: cpwg at icann.org
Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff
Subject: SAC 109


Dear CPWG Members,


The SSAC has published the SAC 109 report, "The implications of DNS over HTTPS and DNS over TLS":
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-109-en.pdf<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_system_files_files_sac-2D109-2Den.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=ds9md1zoepmwqw2nfk-Vs9ssxn1I3jPs97ekKkctEkM&m=u5Q7UOaYrotFmiVoMSmQmVUM1cRfjrekQ9kXkfVezac&s=x1YRsLeX31Yc1AydcimNnVFTBFexf7S4g_FQIJIUkr0&e=>

A notable quote, shared by Andrei Kolesnikov, At-Large Liaison to the SSAC:

"The issues raised by DoH and DoT and by the implementation and deployment choices that exist for them are not straightforward. It is not possible to lay them out with universally agreed-upon"right" and "wrong" labels. We realized that we were not going to get consensus on clear, strong statements such as, "More privacy is always better," or "More encryption is always better." Nor could we make clear, strong statements about trust models or the like that we would all agree with, because we all look at it in different ways."

Kind Regards,
Evin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200313/9c0c6722/attachment.html>