[CPWG] Calif. AG mentions ALAC advice in note to ICANN re: PIR

[Bill Woodcock]

> On May 5, 2020, at 7:07 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org> wrote:
> It's telling that all the positive response I've received to my comments yesterday were not posted here. Some came by private email, and some came on social media. Are they too intimidated to speak here, or have they just given up on being able to change ICANN from within?

Dude, you’re absolutely right, but you’re engaging with lobbyists, which are just paid trolls.  They’re paid to disagree with you, so they disagree with you.  If you say something that doesn’t interact with the messages they’re being paid to promote or suppress, they ignore you.  It’s just their function.  It’s the opposite of multistakeholderism, but engaging with them is just going to frustrate you.  Engage with the folks who care about the future of the Internet, and are working to make it happen.  That’s entirely outside of ICANN, unfortunately, but there it is.

                                -Bill

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20200505/afc1958d/signature.asc>