[CPWG] (Final Call) Comments by Wed, 7 April 15:00 UTC: Draft ALAC Advice on Subsequent Procedures v2.0

Wed Apr 7 14:37:25 UTC 2021

Dear Christopher, 

Many thanks for your answer and which I learnt a lots from.  I appreciate the efforts all of ALAC colleagues made to the ICANN board to address those deficiencies.

Very glad to work with the team.

Best wishes,

Yik Chan

-----Original Messages-----
From:"mail at christopherwilkinson.eu CW" <mail at christopherwilkinson.eu>
Sent Time:2021-04-07 19:52:08 (Wednesday)
To: "钱忆亲" <yik-chan.chin at bnu.edu.cn>, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
Cc: "Marita Moll" <mmoll at ca.inter.net>, "Marita Moll via CPWG" <cpwg at icann.org>, h.raiche at internode.on.net, "Justine Chew" <justine.chew at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [CPWG] (Final Call) Comments by Wed, 7 April 15:00 UTC: Draft ALAC Advice on Subsequent Procedures v2.0

Dear Yik-chan Chin 钱忆亲:

Thankyou for your question.

First, responding to your example: HK is one of the two letter ISO 3166 codes that has already been delegated as a ccTLD. All other 2 letter codes are excluded from gTLDs.

So, Haokao town could apply for <.Haokao> without any duplication with Hong Kong.

Secondly, and more generally, this is unfinished business. There are indeed quite a few duplicate names world-wide.  In the Sub-Pro PDP this has been used as a justification for granting none or very limited protection to non-Capital City names, with which I disagree. There are thousands of non-Capital City names that should be equally eligible for protection, and which are not duplicates.

If more than one application  emerges for the same non-Capital City name, ICANN will have to develop a procedure for dealing with that. It is not beyond the wit of the community to do that! I have some suggestions, if necessary in due course.

Best regards

Christopher Wilkinson

El 7 de abril de 2021 a las 12:39 钱忆亲 <yik-chan.chin at bnu.edu.cn> escribió:

Hi all,

I made one comment regard to the criteria of defining non-capital city. 

Meanwhile, may I ask one additional question:

if two cities in one country apply for the same geographic name at TLD, for example Haokao and Hong Kong both apply for the HK domain, what is the principle of  deciding which applicant should have that HK domain? is it based on first come first serve principle?

Thanks!

Best,

Yik Chan 

New Articles/Book: 

Chin, Yik Chan (2020) ‘Internet governance in China: the network governance approach’ In Dragan Pavlićević and Zhengxu Wang (eds.) Social Relations and Political Development in China: Change and Continuity in the ‘New Era’, London: Routledge: page 134-153.

Chin, Yik Chan (2018) Legitimation of Media Regulation in China, Chinese Political Science Review, 3(2), 172-194.

Chin, Yik Chan (2016) Television Regulation and Media Policy in China, Routledge:https://www.routledge.com/Television-Regulation-and-Media-Policy-in-China/Chin/p/book/9780415490832

---------

Dr. Yik Chan Chin
Associate Professor  
School of Journalism and Communication 
Beijing Normal University 
Beijing, P. R. China 215123
Email: yik-chan.chin at bnu.edu.cn；yikchanchin at gmail.com

https://sjc.bnu.edu.cn/sztd/jsdw2/fjs/106759.html

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yik_Chan_Chin

http://ssrn.com/author=1377946

https://bnu.academia.edu/YikChanChin

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=u41w5b4AAAAJ&hl=en

-----Original Messages-----
From:"Alan Greenberg via CPWG" <cpwg at icann.org>
Sent Time:2021-04-07 10:21:47 (Wednesday)
To: "mail at christopherwilkinson.eu CW" <mail at christopherwilkinson.eu>, "Marita Moll" <mmoll at ca.inter.net>, "Marita Moll via CPWG" <cpwg at icann.org>, h.raiche at internode.on.net, "Justine Chew" <justine.chew at gmail.com>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [CPWG] (Final Call) Comments by Wed, 7 April 15:00 UTC: Draft ALAC Advice on Subsequent Procedures v2.0

I am making some suggested changes, largely driven by the discussion on RVCs held during our recent plenary session. They will be done in the next couple of hours.

Alan

At 2021-04-06 09:37 AM, mail at christopherwilkinson.eu CW via CPWG wrote:

No further comments. OK.

Thankyou, Justine.

CW
El 6 de abril de 2021 a las 15:24 Marita Moll via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org> escribiÃ³:

No final comments from me except to say that this document articulates very clearly where At Large stands on many issues and will continue to be an excellent reference document for some time to come.

Marita
On 4/5/2021 6:44 PM, h.raiche--- via CPWG wrote:
Thanks Justine

Happy with your additional comments on SSAC 115 particularly

Holly

On Apr 5, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Justine Chew via CPWG < cpwg at icann.org> wrote:

All,

The ALAC Advice to the ICANN Board on Subsequent Procedures, draft v2.0 (Comment-only Googledoc)  has been updated to specifically address the input on DNS abuse mitigation, SAC115 and the SSR2 Final Report,  received during last week's CPWG call of 31 Mar. 

Since the vast majority of this draft advice has been open for feedback for many weeks, I am asking for final comments on it, if any, by this Wednesday, 7 April at 15:00 UTC so that it can be finalized for ratification by the ALAC before submission to the ICANN Board.

Thanks,

Justine Chew
---
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list CPWG at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg _______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy
( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
Service
( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link
above to change your membership status or configuration, including
unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery
altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so
on.

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20210407/d3108644/attachment-0001.html>