[CPWG] [GNSO-TPR] RrSG survey re: domain locks
gopal at annauniv.edu
gopal at annauniv.edu
Sun Dec 5 11:28:16 UTC 2021
Daer Dr. Steinar Grøtterød,
Hope you will have time to discuss the tabulated data in the next CPWG
Meeting.
Quick Note: It has been nicely noted that 30 day + 60 day = 61.9% which
is good news.
I have been reading the Regostrar Domains Under Management [DUM]
tabulated data as:
Group A:
0-5,000 : Zero to 30 Days - Attention
Group B
5,001 - 50,000 7 days 60 days
5,001 - 50,000 24 hours 24 hours
Group C:
50,001 - 100,000 60 days 60 days
Group D: Has the maximum 7 Subgroups
100,001 - 999,999 30 days 30 days
100,001 - 999,999 60 days 60 days
100,001 - 999,999 60 days 30 days
100,001 - 999,999 No lock No lock - Attention
100,001 - 999,999 No lock 24 hours
100,001 - 999,999 60 days 30 days
100,001 - 999,999 60 days 60 days
Group E: 60 Days is not seen here !!!
1-5 million No lock No lock - Attention
1-5 million 30 days 7 days
1-5 million 15 days 15 days
1-5 million 30 days 30 days
Group F:
5 million + 60 days 30 days
5 million + 60 days 60 days
5 million + 60 days 30 days
5 million + No lock No lock - Attention
5 million + 30 days 30 days
Into which group do the following top Domain Registrars given below
belong to ?
Domain.com
Namecheap
Bluehost
HostGator
Google Domains
Hover
GoDaddy
Name.com
Hostinger
DreamHost
HostPapa
NameSilo
Dynadot
How many hazards did each group manage ?
It has been nicely noted that 30 day + 60 day = 61.9% which is good
news.
In any case, I stand by the "worst - case design of 60 days" that is
fully backed by
the history.
Hope such an anaylsis can happen some time as we move on with 60 days.
Sincerely,
Gopal T V
0 9840121302
https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545
https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. T V Gopal
Professor
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
College of Engineering
Anna University
Chennai - 600 025, INDIA
Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340
(Res) 24454753
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On 2021-12-04 13:11, Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attached is the Registrar survey connected to the inter-registrar 60
> days lock questions.
>
> Regards,
> Steinar Grøtterød
>
> On 03/12/2021, 20:54, "GNSO-TPR on behalf of Owen Smigelski via
> GNSO-TPR" <gnso-tpr-bounces at icann.org on behalf of gnso-tpr at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Attached is the document I shared during Tuesday’s meeting
> regarding RrSG member feedback regarding domain name locks at creation
> and transfer. As requested, I added a breakdown by registrar type and
> size. I was not able to find any correlation between either registrar
> size or type and the preferred lock period.
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Owen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman
> link above to change your membership status or configuration,
> including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling
> delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
More information about the CPWG
mailing list