[CPWG] Statement on ODP Concept Paper v2.0

[Justine Chew]

Hi Alan,

I agree with your approach to the ALAC comment.

The earlier proposed Design Feedback Group in the ODP concept paper v1,
while seemingly bureaucratic in nature, did offer recognized opportunities
for stakeholders outside those represented in the GNSO Council to intercede
(where needed) in the manner ICANN Org takes issues of implementation
planning to the ICANN Board. This is an important point. And I am also a
little concerned with how the approach (to be) taken in this ODP paper v2
would ultimately set a precedent for considering implementation planning of
policy recommendations coming down the line, such as those for RPMs and
SubPro.

Justine

On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 01:49, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
wrote:

> My preference is to not add that for the following reasons:
>
> - it is indeed a valid question, but it is a result of the insertion
> of the GNSO Liaison into the equation, which is out main point of
> contention - and why the GNSO Council itself is even the focus.
>
> - I am a bit worried that they may address your point and ignore the
> main one - it is FAR easier to address than putting back some sort of DFG.
>
> Let's discuss further.
>
> Alan
>
> At 2021-01-19 12:01 PM, Hadia  Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi wrote:
> >Thanks Alan for the statement, I had a comment in relation to the
> >flow chart on the last page of the concept paper.  The flow chart
> >indicates a direct path of communication between the GNSO council
> >and the ODP team other than the GNSO Council Liaison/Liaisons to the
> >ODP group. More clarification is required in relation to this other
> >means of communication between the ODP team and the GNSO council and
> >if you have some other direct means of communication between the
> >council and the ODP team why do you need a Liaison?
> >
> >Hadia
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:45 PM
> >To: CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
> >Subject: [CPWG] Statement on ODP Concept Paper v2.0
> >
> >At the last CPWG, I was asked to draft a statement on the
> >Operational Design Phase Concept Paper (v2.0).
> >
> >The draft statement is now posted to the wiki
> >(https://community.icann.org/x/qgNACQ) and is attached here for your
> >convenience.
> >
> >The deadline for submission is Friday, 22 January 2021.
> >
> >Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20210120/f3370168/attachment.html>