[CPWG] ALAC Advice

[Jonathan Zuck]

I agree that we should have this discussion.  It's unfortunate to have it in a public forum because it really has to do with how the ALAC and the At-Large community operates. Let's do it!
Jonathan

Jonathan Zuck
Executive Director
Innovators Network Foundation
www.InnovatorsNetwork.org<http://www.InnovatorsNetwork.org>
Main: +1 (202) 827-7594
Direct: +1 (202) 420-7483
________________________________
From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Roberto Gaetano via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 6:18:57 AM
To: CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Subject: [CPWG] ALAC Advice

Dear all,
At today's session on "End User Participation in ICANN PDPs and their Role within the ICANN ecosystem” we had different opinions on how to deal with the situation in which At-Large does not reach a consensus position.
>From the discussion on the chat it emerged that there are different views. I also believe that this impacts also on the role of ALAC as Advisory Committee. I wonder whether we need to separate the participation on the PDP from the advice (to the Board).
Maybe we should have in a future CPWG session a discussion on this topic.
Cheers,
Roberto
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20210614/9a812709/attachment.html>