[CPWG] Transfer Policy Review Team: Question about the 60-days lock

[sivasubramanian muthusamy]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 2:00 AM Jothan Frakes <jothan at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> A lot of the issues that end up being pushed to ICANN aren’t ICANN issues
>>> at all and are disputes between 3rd parties. We see this all the time.
>>>
>>
>> 100% agree
>
>
>> If the third parties are engaged in registering / re-registering domain
>> names - ccTLD or gTLDs delegated by ICANN - with or without ICANN
>> accreditation, what happens to the domain name due to a dispute between the
>> 3rd parties is still an ICANN issue.
>>
>
> I might agree with this were the words "ccTLD", "re-registering" and
> "ICANN" deleted from it.
>

"Re-registering"  might be inaccurate, I meant renewal. How would that
sentence be presented for your agreement without "ICANN" in it, Jothan? And
why would you leave out ccTLDs?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20211112/1eec18bb/attachment.html>