[CPWG] Considerations about the latest polls

[gopal at annauniv.edu]

+1 Roberto Gaetano

"Safety First"

How safe is safe ? is another small big question in Systems.

In the answer we can bring the vital human.

Gopal T V
0 9840121302
https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545
https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. T V Gopal
Professor
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
College of Engineering
Anna University
Chennai - 600 025, INDIA
Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340
       (Res) 24454753
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On 2021-11-20 21:05, Roberto Gaetano via CPWG wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I have been thinking about the motivations given by some for voting
> Y/N on the 60d period and on the enforcement of the policy. My
> observation is that those who do not want the 60d grace period are
> mostly worried about the inefficiencies, for instance “unnecessary”
> delays in transferring between “good” actors. OTOH, those who want the
> grace period are mostly concerned with the risk of criminal actions
> that could benefit from a quick finalisation of the transfer.
> 
> I wonder therefore if the issue here is the balance between efficiency
> and risk: if we want a system that is safer but slower, let’s have the
> 60d period, if we want a system that is fast but less safe, let’s
> eliminate the 60d.
> 
> Similar considerations apply in the case of “optional” vs “compulsory”
> grace period. It seems obvious that those who are against the 60d want
> at least to be able to have the “opt out” possibility, while those who
> are convinced about the need for it want also to have it applied
> without exceptions (the reasoning behind this, as also pointed out in
> the call, is that the wrongdoers will be obviously opting out).
> 
> In this situation the question is also whether the reduction of the
> length off the period could be a sort of a compromise that gives a bit
> to both parties - or whether the effect would be to make both parties
> unhappy because the result could be neither sufficiently fast nor
> sufficiently secure.
> 
> I am for “slow and safe”, probably also due to age - younger people
> might have a different approach… :-)
> 
> Have a nice weekend,
> Roberto
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman
> link above to change your membership status or configuration,
> including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling
> delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.