[CPWG] Considerations about the latest polls

[Chokri Ben Romdhane]

dear Roberto,
from what I understand , the 60 days lock did not guarantee the safety of
the *transfer*.

Chokri

Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 16:58, gopal--- via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org> a écrit :

> +1 Roberto Gaetano
>
> "Safety First"
>
> How safe is safe ? is another small big question in Systems.
>
> In the answer we can bring the vital human.
>
> Gopal T V
> 0 9840121302
> https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545
> https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Dr. T V Gopal
> Professor
> Department of Computer Science and Engineering
> College of Engineering
> Anna University
> Chennai - 600 025, INDIA
> Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340
>        (Res) 24454753
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> On 2021-11-20 21:05, Roberto Gaetano via CPWG wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I have been thinking about the motivations given by some for voting
> > Y/N on the 60d period and on the enforcement of the policy. My
> > observation is that those who do not want the 60d grace period are
> > mostly worried about the inefficiencies, for instance “unnecessary”
> > delays in transferring between “good” actors. OTOH, those who want the
> > grace period are mostly concerned with the risk of criminal actions
> > that could benefit from a quick finalisation of the transfer.
> >
> > I wonder therefore if the issue here is the balance between efficiency
> > and risk: if we want a system that is safer but slower, let’s have the
> > 60d period, if we want a system that is fast but less safe, let’s
> > eliminate the 60d.
> >
> > Similar considerations apply in the case of “optional” vs “compulsory”
> > grace period. It seems obvious that those who are against the 60d want
> > at least to be able to have the “opt out” possibility, while those who
> > are convinced about the need for it want also to have it applied
> > without exceptions (the reasoning behind this, as also pointed out in
> > the call, is that the wrongdoers will be obviously opting out).
> >
> > In this situation the question is also whether the reduction of the
> > length off the period could be a sort of a compromise that gives a bit
> > to both parties - or whether the effect would be to make both parties
> > unhappy because the result could be neither sufficiently fast nor
> > sufficiently secure.
> >
> > I am for “slow and safe”, probably also due to age - younger people
> > might have a different approach… :-)
> >
> > Have a nice weekend,
> > Roberto
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CPWG mailing list
> > CPWG at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
> > your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
> > accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
> > (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
> > Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman
> > link above to change your membership status or configuration,
> > including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling
> > delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/cpwg/attachments/20211120/c0c402c6/attachment.html>