[CPWG] ICANN position on the Facebook outage

[Bill Jouris]

Say rather that an organisation such as Facebook is should have a thorough design of redundancy.  But, on the evidence, did not.  Perhaps some redundancy designed in.  But thorough, it evidently was not. 
That said, it isn't clear that their shortcomings are ICANN's problem.  Or even ICANN's business.  Any node can go down, and so no longer be reachable.  It's not even particularly unusual.  This was more widespread than most, but no different in essence.  And no more in need of an ICANN response. 
Bill Jouris 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 12:48 PM, sivasubramanian muthusamy via CPWG<cpwg at icann.org> wrote:   _______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20211009/02f32b42/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Untitled
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20211009/02f32b42/Untitled.ksh>