[CPWG] Questions to the board about distributed DNS

[Chokri Ben Romdhane]

Dear Olivier,
Thank you for your time and interest in this topic.
I understand your point very well, and I totally agree with you and with
other friends that we need to engage more discussion within our group  in
order to get the large  consensual  decision, and yes SSAC could be a good
vis a vis at this stage.

Friendly regards
Chokri


Le ven. 19 août 2022 à 11:23, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> a
écrit :

> Dear Chokri,
>
> thanks for bringing this to the CPWG mailing list. Just explaining, I am
> not calling the questions "immature" - I think they are very pertinent
> questions, but in terms of maturity in the At-Large discussion, the ALAC
> position on these topics has not yet matured. Your launch of discussion
> here will indeed help, and I note that Justine's response relating to both
> OCTO and SSAC is very pertinent.
> I mentioned on the call that this could indeed be a topic for the
> customary discussion between SSAC and ALAC at this stage.
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 19/08/2022 12:07, Chokri Ben Romdhane wrote:
>
> Dear friends,
> I personally have in mind those  questions for the board about
>  distributed DNS
>
> "*Some ICANN accredited  registrars sell some blockchain DNS based gTLDs,
> did the board  encourage such activities?*
> *If some non regular DNS causes some collision with some regular DNS gTLD
> ,accredited by ICANN, how will ICANN act to resolve this issue?*"
>
> If you  continue to consider those questions immature as most of our
> friends mentioned during the call, I personally support Sebastien's
> proposal to constitute a subgroup that will continue to follow this topic.
>
> Thank you again for your interest in this topic.
> Friendly regards
> Chokri
>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20220819/05cd916a/attachment.html>