[CPWG] Questions to the board about distributed DNS

[gopal]

Dear All,

It may be better to go back to the using the term "Heterogeneity" rather than mention any specific technology until a degree of maturity happens in making technology choices.

Technology offers clear bounds on "Diversity" to make oneness of purpose feasible as "Heterogeneity".  So many decades after the ISO - OSI Reference Model happened this is quite matured on Technology options.

I am learning with thanks the unique "Multi - Stakeholder" model being pioneered by ICANN that is ushering in some nice managerial processes.

Sincerely,




Gopal T V
0 9840121302
https://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/profile/57545
https://www.facebook.com/gopal.tadepalli
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr. T V Gopal
Professor
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
College of Engineering
Anna University
Chennai - 600 025, INDIA
Ph : (Off) 22351723 Extn. 3340
       (Res) 24454753
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
________________________________
From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Justine Chew via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Sent: 20 August 2022 01:09
To: Chokri Ben Romdhane <chokribr at gmail.com>; Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>
Cc: CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CPWG] Questions to the board about distributed DNS

Eduardo, Chokri,

Thank you for your replies, which tells me what you are talking about exactly.

I think the mention of use of blockchains in this context clouds the real issue - which is whether the existence of an alternate DNS to the one that ICANN "manages" threatens the core concept of one world one Internet.

Justine
------

On Sat, 20 Aug 2022, 01:17 Chokri Ben Romdhane, <chokribr at gmail.com<mailto:chokribr at gmail.com>> wrote:
Thank you Eduardo for sharing this useful record, a similar session have been presented  during the Middle East DNS forum 2022
https://icann.zoom.us/rec/share/8mbLwUflmBNDNS7bHPuj3jJxeKIE7n3mXX3--Kb1g4-zCjOUtkPhS1E36EuZBruZ.USblxEm6HtxLfJUp?startTime=1652695213000

Freindly Regards
Chokri


Le ven. 19 août 2022 à 3:24 PM, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com<mailto:eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>> a écrit :
Justine:

Encirca is selling domains in the blockchain - see https://www.encirca.com/blockchain/.

Check the presentation that they gave NARALO about this theme:  https://www.facebook.com/647891920/videos/2953461934799818/ . The presentation starts around 4 minutes into the video.

-ed

-ed

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 7:08 AM Chokri Ben Romdhane via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org<mailto:cpwg at icann.org>> wrote:
Dear Justine,
Thank you for your time and interest in this topic.
To answer your question "Do you have or can you collect some actual data to support your remark of "Some ICANN accredited registrars sell some blockchain DNS based gTLDs,"
Yes , I know some as I have mentioned in the question but it will be very hard to get exact data, and   I think that it will be useful to suggest to ICANN to make a study about the accredit registrar whose selling Blockchain domain name.

Friendly regards
Chokri

Le ven. 19 août 2022 à 11:00, Justine Chew <justine.chew.icann at gmail.com<mailto:justine.chew.icann at gmail.com>> a écrit :
We need to examine available information such as:
-Whether OCTO has or is looking to change its position from the relevant paper it published in April 2022 on this topic, in light of developments with blockchain etc etc
-Whether SSAC has or is working on an opinion on the topic (outside of NCAP, for which alt DNS is out of scope)

Do you have or can you collect some actual data to support your remark of "Some ICANN accredited registrars sell some blockchain DNS based gTLDs,"?

Kind regards,
Justine



On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 17:08, Chokri Ben Romdhane <chokribr at gmail.com<mailto:chokribr at gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear friends,
I personally have in mind those  questions for the board about  distributed DNS

"Some ICANN accredited  registrars sell some blockchain DNS based gTLDs, did the board  encourage such activities?
If some non regular DNS causes some collision with some regular DNS gTLD ,accredited by ICANN, how will ICANN act to resolve this issue?"

If you  continue to consider those questions immature as most of our friends mentioned during the call, I personally support Sebastien's proposal to constitute a subgroup that will continue to follow this topic.

Thank you again for your interest in this topic.
Friendly regards
Chokri

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.


--
Notice: This email may contain confidential information, is subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20220821/1a4a5959/attachment-0001.html>