[CPWG] REMINDER: At-Large Input to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks

[Heidi Ullrich]

Dear All,

Please see below important information for today’s CPWG discussion on Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks within the context of the Transfer Policy Review PDP.

A series of polls will be shown during the discussion. The questions and relevant document are available in Steinar’s note.

Kind regards,
Heidi

From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Reply to: Steinar Grøtterød <steinar at recito.no>
Date: Tuesday, 8 March 2022 at 4:31 AM
To: CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Subject: [CPWG] At-Large Input to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks

Dear all CPWG members,

With the object to give background and a constructive discussion at the CPWG meeting, At-Large members in the GNSO Transfer Policy Review PDP have created a document focus on the PDP charter questions connected to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks.

The Google document located at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgwPEI/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgwPEI/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!o7xbaDZ3zlEMJ9zB_ar52P9CuVhxFFJ30y7gtpx7vyPshkFNnGN930TUnQGGZT_wx4oQBEYKFg$> should give the CPWG members the needed information to participate in an informal “poll”:

QUESTION TO BE DISCUSSED BY CPWG MEMBERS
For the post-creation lock question

What lock period will be of preference:

  *   10 days post-creation lock
  *   30 days post-creation lock
  *   60 days post-creation lock
  *   Not sure
  *   Abstain
For the post-transfer lock question
What lock period will be of preference:

  *   10 days post-transfer lock
  *   30 days post-transfer lock
  *   60 days post-transfer lock
  *   Not sure
  *   Abstain
For the question regarding Registry Operator

  *   Same policy for all Registry Operator
  *   A Registry Operator MAY define a different transfer lock policy
  *   Not sure
  *   Abstain

I kindly ask the CPWG members to review the Google document [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgwPEI/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!o7xbaDZ3zlEMJ9zB_ar52P9CuVhxFFJ30y7gtpx7vyPshkFNnGN930TUnQGGZT_wx4oQBEYKFg$>. The CPWG chair may decide when to put this on the CPWG agenda.

Regards,

Steinar Grøtterød

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20220316/f1d170e2/attachment-0001.html>