[CPWG] REMINDER: At-Large Input to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks

[Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond]

Thanks Heidi.

All -- I cannot emphasize enough how it would be helpful if you all 
studied the issue prior to the call, in order to make your choice.
If you have a question about the issue, please ask it here, so we don't 
take more than the allocated time for this topic. As the follow-up call 
to last week's ICANN 73 meeting, today's CPWG call aganda is going to be 
rather full, hence there will be little time to explain the issues in 
detail.
Many thanks for your understanding,

Olivier

On 16/03/2022 18:26, Heidi Ullrich wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please see below important information for today’s CPWG discussion on 
> Post-creation and Post-Transfer Lockswithin the context of the 
> Transfer Policy Review PDP.
>
> A series of polls will be shown during the discussion. The questions 
> and relevant document are available in Steinar’s note.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Heidi
>
> *From: *CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
> *Reply to: *Steinar Grøtterød <steinar at recito.no>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 8 March 2022 at 4:31 AM
> *To: *CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[CPWG] At-Large Input to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks
>
> Dear all CPWG members,
>
> With the object to give background and a constructive discussion at 
> the CPWG meeting, At-Large members in the GNSO Transfer Policy Review 
> PDP have created a document focus on the PDP charter questions 
> connected to Post-creation and Post-Transfer Locks.
>
> The Google document located at 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgwPEI/edit?usp=sharing 
> [docs.google.com] 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgwPEI/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!o7xbaDZ3zlEMJ9zB_ar52P9CuVhxFFJ30y7gtpx7vyPshkFNnGN930TUnQGGZT_wx4oQBEYKFg$> 
> should give the CPWG members the needed information to participate in 
> an informal “poll”:
>
> QUESTION TO BE DISCUSSED BY CPWG MEMBERS**
>
> For the post-creation lock question**
>
> What lock period will be of preference:
>
>   * 10 days post-creation lock
>   * 30 days post-creation lock
>   * 60 days post-creation lock
>   * Not sure
>   * Abstain
>
> For the post-transfer lock question**
>
> What lock period will be of preference:
>
>   * 10 days post-transfer lock
>   * 30 days post-transfer lock
>   * 60 days post-transfer lock
>   * Not sure
>   * Abstain
>
> For the question regarding Registry Operator **
>
>   * Same policy for all Registry Operator
>   * A Registry Operator MAY define a different transfer lock policy
>   * Not sure
>   * Abstain
>
> I kindly ask the CPWG members to review the Google document 
> [docs.google.com] 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1Ht1fl9LAiqCvJCHCvY5eWao_lOBdKmgpr7kChLgwPEI/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!o7xbaDZ3zlEMJ9zB_ar52P9CuVhxFFJ30y7gtpx7vyPshkFNnGN930TUnQGGZT_wx4oQBEYKFg$>. 
> The CPWG chair may decide when to put this on the CPWG agenda.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steinar Grøtterød
>

-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20220316/4eeac789/attachment.html>