[CPWG] Summary of the last GNSO-TRT meeting

Wed Sep 13 13:06:10 UTC 2023

Thank you for the additions.

Regarding my personal comment: I still do not understand, what “ICANN
approved” means. Some talk about “ICANN initiated” i.e after closure of a
registrar,  others talk about “bulk transfer” and hope for ICANN covering
the costs.

Von: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> Im Auftrag von Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. September 2023 14:05
An: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz at donnerhacke.de>; CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
Betreff: Re: [CPWG] Summary of the last GNSO-TRT meeting

Dear Lutz,

First – thanks for being my proxy on the meeting on Sep. 12, 2023.

I listened to the recordings and want to add to your summary and comment the
following:

As a background, the current policy has a very simple fee:
- Bulk transfers with less than n 50k domains = No fee
- Bulk transfers with more than n 50k domains = 50k US$ flat

Steinar: The present policy refers to the level of 50k domain names pr. TLD.
The GNSO-TPR WG need to decide if the level still should be “by TLD”.

>From the end user perspective there is only one notable point:
- Registrants need to be informed about the change of the registrar (via
reseller) beforehand.
- Registrants need to accept the legal rules of the new registrar.

Steinar: Added to this is my proposal (in the working doc.) to include text
informing that the Registrant may opt-out by finding a new Registrar before
the ICANN approved transfer takes place.

Steinar: I don’t understand this comment and hope you can explain this
either on the CPWG call or on this mailing list:

For me there is only one point of interest: If "voluntary bulk transfers"
are combined with "ICANN approved bulk transfers" into a single policy, the
financial benefits and organisational simplifications of the "ICANN approved
transfers" may be extended to ordinary, commercial activities. This may
bring ICANN into the position of an omnipresent mediator, which is paying
for the commercial gambling of the registrars and resellers.

Regards,

Steinar Grøtterød

From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org <mailto:cpwg-bounces at icann.org> > on
behalf of Lutz Donnerhacke via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org <mailto:cpwg at icann.org>
>
Date: Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 13:50
To: cpwg at icann.org <mailto:cpwg at icann.org>  <cpwg at icann.org
<mailto:cpwg at icann.org> >
Subject: [CPWG] Summary of the last GNSO-TRT meeting

There are three major topics in the discussion yesterday:

--- BEGIN OF SUMMARY ---

Full Portfolio Transfers (Bulk Transfers):
- Preliminary Agreement #1: Registry Operators MAY charge a fee for
transferring full domain portfolios, with the option to waive fees in
specific cases.
- Concept 4: Ensures fees for full portfolio transfers involving multiple
registries don't exceed a recommended ceiling, with fees distributed based
on the number of domain names.

Change of Sponsorship (Partial Bulk Transfers):
- Preliminary Agreement #1: Registrars must notify affected registrants at
least 30 days before a change of sponsorship, providing details like the
change date, Gaining Registrar's name, and terms of service.
- Preliminary Agreement #4: Registrants' existing Registration Agreements
should allow transfers during a change of sponsorship, and registrants must
confirm agreement with new terms before the transfer.

Additional Discussions:
- Consideration of replacing specific fee numbers with a flexible
"reasonable fee" in policy language.
- Debate on the relevance of a minimum threshold (e.g., 50,000 domain names)
for fees.
- Emphasis on clear language and use of "MAY" in fee-related policies.
- Recognition of the need for project management representation and
potential ICANN Org involvement in fee administration.

--- END OF SUMMARY ---

As a background, the current policy has a very simple fee:
- Bulk transfers with less than n 50k domains = No fee
- Bulk transfers with more than n 50k domains = 50k US$ flat

>From the end user perspective there is only one notable point:
- Registrants need to be informed about the change of the registrar (via
reseller) beforehand.
- Registrants need to accept the legal rules of the new registrar.

For me there is only one point of interest: If "voluntary bulk transfers"
are combined with "ICANN approved bulk transfers" into a single policy, the
financial benefits and organisational simplifications of the "ICANN approved
transfers" may be extended to ordinary, commercial activities. This may
bring ICANN into the position of an omnipresent mediator, which is paying
for the commercial gambling of the registrars and resellers.

_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org <mailto:CPWG at icann.org> 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the
website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit
the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration,
including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery
altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20230913/08a5f5ab/attachment.html>