[CWG-Stewardship] My concerns with the draft proposal and an alternative option

[Alan Greenberg]

I also must have missed some messages. Who is it that convenes the 
PRT? Who protects its members from lawsuits or threat or pressure? 
Who is it that monitors that IANA is following policy (particularly 
policy that registries would prefer not being followed)? Funding? 
There are more questions, but I think I will stop there.

Alan

At 01/12/2014 11:31 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>Dear Avri,
>
>On 01/12/2014 17:16, Avri Doria wrote:
> > On 01-Dec-14 17:02, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> >> But my main reason for opposition is that I am far from convinced
> >> that all of the questions I and others have can be viably answered.
> >
> > As far as I can tell they have been answered.  You just have not
> > accepted the answers you have been given.
> > which is of course your right.  But from my reading they have been
> > answered multiple times in different ways.
>
>I am sorry, I must have missed the messages. Please point me to the
>archived message(s) which provide(s):
>
>1. Proposed contracting entity structure; PRT (or MRT) entity structure.
>2. Jurisdiction of contracting company. Jurisdiction of PRT (MRT) entity.
>3. Accountability processes that will be ingrained in the bylaws of the
>above two entities.
>
>At that point, I might feel better about delegating those two functions
>to new legal entities.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Olivier
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship