[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday December 3rd

[Milton L Mueller]

Appreciate the attempt but I am not sure this is a good idea. If this public comment period is like every one I have ever seen before, 90% of the comments will come on the day of the deadline or perhaps a day before. The running log therefore kind of privileges early comments as they trickle in. Then we will be hit with a deluge at the end anyway. Might be better to look at all comments after they all come in.

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 9:35 AM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday December 3rd

All,

This will be part of a daily log of public comments to assist us on in keeping track of the various postings.

Comments on how to improve this welcome.

B.,

For December 2nd we have the following:

Date

From

Summary

20141202

Page Howe

Current system with NTIA is doing a good job and wants it maintained.

20141202

 Graham Schreiber

Garbled paste into body of comment

20141202

 Graham Schreiber

Refers to a US supreme court case about .com (?) involving a number of parties including ICANN and suggesting that the transition work not proceed until this is resolved.


A cumulative of these summaries is provided as an Excel file - attached.

B.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141203/192324c3/attachment.html>