[CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday December 3rd

Bernard Turcotte turcotte.bernard at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 16:01:06 UTC 2014


Milton,

I agree with most of what you say except that the log "privileges" early
comments - it simply lists comments when they come in.

Although most comments will come in on the last few days we will probably
get a large volume of these given the interest in the topic.

As such we will certainly need some sort of classification/organization of
these beyond the raw list - this is just an initial stab at this which I
will keep doing  - just thought it would be useful for some on this list.

Cheers.

B.

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Appreciate the attempt but I am not sure this is a good idea. If this
> public comment period is like every one I have ever seen before, 90% of the
> comments will come on the day of the deadline or perhaps a day before. The
> running log therefore kind of privileges early comments as they trickle in.
> Then we will be hit with a deluge at the end anyway. Might be better to
> look at all comments after they all come in.
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Bernard Turcotte
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 3, 2014 9:35 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CWG - Public Comment summary for Wednesday
> December 3rd
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> This will be part of a daily log of public comments to assist us on in
> keeping track of the various postings.
>
>
>
> Comments on how to improve this welcome.
>
>
>
> B.,
>
>
>
> For December 2nd we have the following:
>
>
>
> *Date*
>
> *From*
>
> *Summary*
>
> *20141202*
>
> *Page Howe*
>
> *Current system with NTIA is doing a good job and wants it maintained.*
>
> *20141202*
>
> * Graham Schreiber*
>
> *Garbled paste into body of comment*
>
> *20141202*
>
> * Graham Schreiber*
>
> *Refers to a US supreme court case about .com (?) involving a number of
> parties including ICANN and suggesting that the transition work not proceed
> until this is resolved.*
>
> A cumulative of these summaries is provided as an Excel file - attached.
>
>
>
> B.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141203/271143e1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list