[CWG-Stewardship] Principles

[Robert Guerra]

concur with Milton and Chuck on this one.

Robert

> On Dec 7, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
> 
> Yes, I agree. But the principle as formulated implies that every entity involved in management must be MS, which I think is excessive.
>  
> From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com <mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2014 5:59 PM
> To: Milton L Mueller; Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>  
> Milton,
>  
> It is ineffective to literally manage in a multistakeholder way but it is possible to respect and follow multistakeholder developed policies in managing.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu <mailto:mueller at syr.edu>] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 5:55 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>  
> I dissent from principle g by the way. I could see why oversight of IANA might be multi-stakeholder, but management need not be.
>  
> -MM
>  
>  
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] <mailto:[mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org]> On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2014 4:18 PM
> To: Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>  
> I made a couple more edits in item g at the end of the document.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: Gomes, Chuck 
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 4:12 PM
> To: 'Lise Fuhr'; cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>  
> I made a couple edits and suggested a third in my next to last comment.  I also identified in my comments some possible action items that the CWG may need to perform as soon as possible assuming that the principles are adopted by the CWG.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] <mailto:[mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org]> On Behalf Of Lise Fuhr
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 8:34 AM
> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org <mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>  
> Dear All,
>  
> We hereby send you a redline and a clean version of the Principles document. For the unresolved part, staff has done a table. We recommend that we focus on the outstanding issues, that are identified in the comments. We welcome any inputs on either the comments or on the redline draft. The document will be finalized on the next call.
>  
> Best regards,
> Martin and Lise
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141208/2fa66c2c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2841 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141208/2fa66c2c/smime-0001.p7s>