[CWG-Stewardship] Principles

[Greg Shatan]

My edits and comments are attached.

Greg

*Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab*

*666 Third Avenue **ï** New York, NY 10017-5621*

*Direct*  212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022

*Fax*  212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428

*gsshatan at lawabel.com <gsshatan at lawabel.com>*

*ICANN-related: gregshatanipc at gmail.com <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> *

*www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>*

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
wrote:

> concur with Milton and Chuck on this one.
>
> Robert
>
> On Dec 7, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
> Yes, I agree. But the principle as formulated implies that every entity
> involved in management must be MS, which I think is excessive.
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com <cgomes at verisign.com>]
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 7, 2014 5:59 PM
> *To:* Milton L Mueller; Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>
> Milton,
>
> It is ineffective to literally manage in a multistakeholder way but it is
> possible to respect and follow multistakeholder developed policies in
> managing.
>
> Chuck
>
> *From:* Milton L Mueller [mailto:mueller at syr.edu <mueller at syr.edu>]
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 5:55 PM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>
> I dissent from principle g by the way. I could see why oversight of IANA
> might be multi-stakeholder, but management need not be.
>
> -MM
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 7, 2014 4:18 PM
> *To:* Lise Fuhr; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>
> I made a couple more edits in item g at the end of the document.
>
> Chuck
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 4:12 PM
> *To:* 'Lise Fuhr'; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>
> I made a couple edits and suggested a third in my next to last comment.  I
> also identified in my comments some possible action items that the CWG may
> need to perform as soon as possible assuming that the principles are
> adopted by the CWG.
>
> Chuck
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Lise Fuhr
> *Sent:* Friday, December 05, 2014 8:34 AM
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Principles
>
> Dear All,
>
> We hereby send you a redline and a clean version of the Principles
> document. For the unresolved part, staff has done a table. We recommend
> that we focus on the outstanding issues, that are identified in the
> comments. We welcome any inputs on either the comments or on the redline
> draft. The document will be finalized on the next call.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin and Lise
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141208/a2d6bbd5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Draft of Principles_4 December_commentsonly with Gomes input 7 Dec 14 v2_GS.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 59704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141208/a2d6bbd5/DraftofPrinciples_4December_commentsonlywithGomesinput7Dec14v2_GS-0001.docx>