[CWG-Stewardship] Strickling Remarks from 4 December re IANA Transition and Accountability

[Guru Acharya]

Understood Milton. In fact I sincerely believe that if the NTIA or the
ICANN Board has a problem with our current proposal then they should send
an email to Grace for registration as "participants" of the CWG and then
deliberate with us at an equal footing; or otherwise send their comments in
the public comments period.

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> So much of what you say is driven by what the NTIA wants and what the
> ICANN board wants.
>
>
>
> Guru:
>
> I am sorry to have to point this out, but Alan Greenberg is not an
> employee of the U.S. Department of Commerce, has not been designated as
> their agent in this process, and thus is in no better position to tell us
> what NTIA wants or what it will accept than you are or I am. The NTIA has
> told us its requirements in its public announcements.
>
>
>
> Milton L Mueller
>
> Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
>
> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>
> http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
>
> Internet Governance Project
>
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141215/63d8a01a/attachment.html>