[CWG-Stewardship] Composition of MRT

[Alan Greenberg]

Balanced MS representation is essential. Although 
the MRT is not a policy setting body, it IS a 
policy enforcing body and as such, it needs balanced representation.  Alan

At 17/12/2014 09:04 AM, Lindeberg, Elise wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>I agree with the comments from Milton, Lise and 
>Dona on a flexible solution and avoiding 
>swelling out of proportions  - but I don’t see 
>an argument for registries (ccs and gs) having 
>greater rather than equal representation on the 
>MRT. The CWG is working on the basis of a model 
>with a distinction between the Customer Standing 
>Committee  (CSC)  - who will evaluating IANA 
>reports and performance of the IANA function for 
>the community at large, based on a direct 
>customer relationship and the Multistakeholder 
>Review team (MRT), who need to be real 
>Multistakeholder with en equally balanced 
>representation from the community at large. 
>Operational stability, reliability of the IANA 
>service and the actual placing of the IANA 
>function is of the outmost importance for the whole community.
>
>Best
>
>Elise
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141217/c1ee9ac9/attachment.html>