[CWG-Stewardship] Statement by JNC on IANA transition

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I agree in one part, the way this was structured by IGC seems bonkers*,
but we are stuck with it.

On the other part it think it is our problem to deal with issues
wherever they come from.  One way to use this might be to test against
it. For example it contains principles, how does it test against the
principles we are establishing?  Also in reading it, I wonder how may of
the ideas have not already expressed by one or the other of us. 

In any case, all sorts of things might have been better in this process
(let me count the ways), but I think these are early comments we just
need to deal with.

avri

* crazy

On 10-Nov-14 22:12, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> I guess I question whether he should have been given that option.  It is not fair to have others who are volunteers and already overworked do his work.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 9:36 PM
> To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Statement by JNC on IANA transition
>
> Hi,
>
> He was encouraged to join the list by several of us.  But he found the conditions in the charter unacceptable and has opted for this alternate path, as provided by the ICG.
>
> avri
> On 10-Nov-14 18:48, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> Milton,
>
>
>
> I personally think it would be much better if the ICG encouraged the JNC to have a representative participate in the IANA CWG rather than forward a very long and generic document to the CWG and expect those who are committing long hours of time already taking additional long hours to decipher the JNC comments and trying to fit them in to CWG work.  If they had a representative on the CWG as participant, that person could better express JNC positions than any of us could and would be allowed to participate fully except when it comes to directly deciding consensus.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
>
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 11:54 AM
>
> To: 'cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>'
>
> Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Statement by JNC on IANA transition
>
>
>
> With my ICG member hat on, I am conveying a comment we received to this group, at their request
>
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00009.html
>
>
>
> Milton L. Mueller
>
> Laura J. and L. Douglas Meredith Professor Syracuse University School of Information Studies http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/mueller/Home.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org<mailto:CWG-Stewardship at icann.org>
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141111/5f5ca488/attachment.html>