[CWG-Stewardship] Concern with Contract Co.

[Bertrand de La Chapelle]

Is the idea of a contract Co. a done deal? Establishing any organization
with whatever limited staff is usually a recipe for its growth in time.

Is the option of having separate complementary contracts by the different
users of the IANA functions off the table?

B.

"*Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes*", Antoine de
Saint Exupéry
("*There is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans*")BERTRAND DE
LA CHAPELLEInternet & Jurisdiction Project | Director

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> I think this has exactly a 180 degree wrong approach
>
> • Contract Co. – This is a not for profit company whose only function is
> to be signatory to the contract with the IANA Functions Operator. As such
> this entity would have no staff.
>
>
> I think that this should have nothing but staff, a minimal staff of one or
> two  I.e it should have a neutral Administrator that does what the PRT
> tells her to do in terms of the contract adminstration, and perhaps a
> backup/aise.  It could also be the Root Zone Management Process
> Administrator as that is a clerical staff function.
>
> avri
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141127/8241467c/attachment.html>