[CWG-Stewardship] Concern with Contract Co.

[Avri Doria]

On 28-Nov-14 19:36, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Is the option of having separate complementary contracts by the different users of the IANA functions off the table?
>
> MM: By “different users of the IANA functions” do you mean the names, protocols and numbers users? If so I would admonish you again to stick to the knitting of this group, which is focused on names. We are not holistically redesigning the IANA arrangements we are focused on the names part exclusively.

In fact the ICG has done its best to make sure we don't have
complementary solutions as the first decision they made on how the
process and hence solution should be designed.

It is a coordinators' decision that seems to have been made that most
all have just accepted.

avri

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141129/f204b0bd/attachment.html>