[CWG-Stewardship] NTIA- An Update on the IANA Transition
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Aug 18 13:37:28 UTC 2015
It is proposing a lot more than high-level
principles. It is a roadmap for replacement of
the NTIA-Verisign cooperative agreement.
Alan
At 18/08/2015 03:31 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Larry has just posted an update on the IANA
>transition and extension of ICANN contract. An
>item of the update is the proposal that
>addresses the administrative(middleman) role of
>NTIA in the update of the root. Although the CWG
>did not address this in its proposal due to
>scope, it highlights some high level principles
>(expectations) on this. It may be good to check
>if the ICANN/Verisign proposal meets such expectations.
>
>Regards
>
>
><http://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2015/update-iana-transition>http://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2015/update-iana-transition
>
>
>An Update on the IANA Transition
>
>
>August 17, 2015 by Assistant Secretary for
>Communications and Information and NTIA Administrator Lawrence E. Strickling
>
>The Internetâs global multistakeholder
>community has made tremendous progress in its
>work to develop a proposal to transition the
>historic stewardship role NTIA has played
>related to Internetâs domain name system (DNS).
>
>When we
><http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-release/2014/ntia-announces-intent-transition-key-internet-domain-name-functions>announced
>our intent in March 2014 to complete the
>privatization of the DNS, we noted that the base
>period of our contract with ICANN to perform
>technical functions related to the DNS, known as
>the IANA functions, expired on September 30,
>2015. However, it has become increasingly
>apparent over the last few months that the
>community needs time to complete its work, have
>the plan reviewed by the U.S. Government and
>then implement it if it is approved.
>
>Accordingly, in May we asked the groups
>developing the transition documents how long it
>would take to finish and implement their
>proposals. After factoring in time for public
>comment, U.S. Government evaluation and
>implementation of the proposals, the community
>estimated it could take until at least September
>2016 to complete this process. In response to
>their feedback, we informed Congress on Friday
>that we plan to extend our IANA contract with
>ICANN for one year to September 30, 2016. Beyond
>2016, we have options to extend the contract for
>up to three additional years if needed.
>
>This one-year extension will provide the
>community with the time it needs to finish its
>work. The groups are already far along in
>planning the IANA transition and are currently
>taking comments on their IANA transition
>proposals. As we indicated in a recent
><http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/fr_iana_transition_comment_notice_08102015.pdf>Federal
>Register notice, we encourage all interested
>stakeholders to engage and weigh in on the proposals.
>
>In preparation for the implementation phase of
>the IANA stewardship transition, NTIA also asked
>Verisign and ICANN to submit a proposal
>detailing how best to remove NTIAâs
>administrative role associated with root zone
>management, which the groups working on the
>transition were not asked to address. We asked
>Verisign and ICANN to submit a proposal
>detailing how best to do this in a manner that
>maintains the security, stability and resiliency
>of the DNS. Under the current root zone
>management system, Verisign edits and
>distributes the root zone file after it has
>received authorization to do so from NTIA.
>Verisign and ICANN have developed a
><http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/root_zone_administrator_proposal-relatedtoiana_functionsste-final.pdf>proposal
>that outlines a technical plan and testing
>regime for phasing out the largely clerical role
>NTIA currently plays in this process. The
>testing will occur in a parallel environment
>that will not disrupt the current operation of the root zone management system.
>
>These developments will help ensure that the
>IANA transition will be done in a manner that
>preserves the security and stability of the DNS.
>
>Cheers!
>--
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Seun Ojedeji,
>Federal University Oye-Ekiti
>web: <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng>http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
>Mobile: +2348035233535
>alt email:<http://goog_1872880453>
><mailto:seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
>
>The key to understanding is humility - my view !
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150818/a30c9f10/attachment.html>
More information about the CWG-Stewardship
mailing list