[CWG-Stewardship] CWG Position on IANA IPR

[Seun Ojedeji]

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:27:03AM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
> > There's no need to inject any other rationale than that, and in any case,
> > we have no consensus rationale to inject.
>
> Greg's remark there does seem to raise the question of what difference
> it makes what the rationale is.  I think I don't understand what the
> controversy is: why should we care why the CWG came to its conclusion,
> given that the conclusion appears to work out?
>

+1 and this is why i have decided to agree as well; So long as
adding/removing the rationale does not mean CWG is no longer agreeing with
the proposal for a transfer of the IANA TM and domain from the current IFO
then i am fine.

Cheers!


>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

The key to understanding is humility - my view !
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150827/e71dbb14/attachment.html>