[CWG-Stewardship] CWG Position on IANA IPR

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Thu Aug 27 14:30:35 UTC 2015


Hi,

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:27:03AM -0400, Greg Shatan wrote:
> There's no need to inject any other rationale than that, and in any case,
> we have no consensus rationale to inject.

Greg's remark there does seem to raise the question of what difference
it makes what the rationale is.  I think I don't understand what the
controversy is: why should we care why the CWG came to its conclusion,
given that the conclusion appears to work out?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list