[CWG-Stewardship] Triggering of Special IFR

[Greg Shatan]

Same as Chuck and Matthew...

Greg

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

>  My understanding was the same as Chuck's.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 6/11/2015 11:53 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
>  In fact, my understanding is that the CSC cannot launch a Special IFR
> but only escalates to the ccNSO and GNSO for that consideration.
> Donna/Staffan – please correct me if I am wrong on that.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
> <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] * On Behalf Of *Jonathan Robinson
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:45 AM
> *To:* 'Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond'; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Triggering of Special IFR
>
>
>
> Olivier,
>
>
>
> I agree with you understanding in the second instance i.e. as per Annex F.
>
>
>
> " Following the exhaustion of the above escalation mechanisms, the ccNSO
> and GNSO will be responsible for checking and reviewing the outcome of the
> CSC process (as defined in Annex G), and the IANA Problem Resolution
> Process (as defined in Annex J) and for determining whether or not a
> Special IFR is necessary. After consideration, which may include a public
> comment period and must include meaningful consultation with other SO/ACs,
> the Special IFR could be triggered by a supermajority vote of each of the
> ccNSO and GNSO Councils according to their normal procedures for
> determining supermajority. "
>
> To me, this translates to: a special IFR can be launched by CSC *and* GNSO
> *and* ccNSO agreeing that a special IFR needs to be launched. It is
> impossible for the CSC *or* the GNSO *or* the ccNSO to launch a special IFR
> singlehandedly.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> *From:* Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl at gih.com <ocl at gih.com>]
> *Sent:* 11 June 2015 08:30
> *To:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] Triggering of Special IFR
>
>
>
> Hello all
>
> looking at the slide deck for the presentation (downloadable from
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53778352 ), page
> 12 , I raised a question on the first Webinar.
> The slide says: "Review cycles: 1st review to occur no more than 2 years
> post-transition; then every 5 years. Or by special request of CSC, GNSO, or
> ccNSO (Special IFR)."
>
> I took up this sentence and asked: "A Special IFR can be launched by CSC,
> GNSO, *or* ccNSO? I was under the impression that a Special IFR can be
> launched by CSC, GNSO *and* ccNSO" only.
>
> I was told, in response, that the slide is correct, and an IFR can be
> launched by the CSC, or ccNSO or GNSO.
>
> The *or* vs. *and* is very important.
>
> So I looked at the proposal again, Annex F.
>
> " Following the exhaustion of the above escalation mechanisms, the ccNSO
> and GNSO will be responsible for checking and reviewing the outcome of the
> CSC process (as defined in Annex G), and the IANA Problem Resolution
> Process (as defined in Annex J) and for determining whether or not a
> Special IFR is necessary. After consideration, which may include a public
> comment period and must include meaningful consultation with other SO/ACs,
> the Special IFR could be triggered by a supermajority vote of each of the
> ccNSO and GNSO Councils according to their normal procedures for
> determining supermajority. "
>
> To me, this translates to: a special IFR can be launched by CSC *and* GNSO
> *and* ccNSO agreeing that a special IFR needs to be launched. It is
> impossible for the CSC *or* the GNSO *or* the ccNSO to launch a special IFR
> singlehandedly.
>
> So is the slide on page 12 and the response I was given on the First
> Webinar right or wrong? This is a serious issue.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing listCWG-Stewardship at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
> --
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)+ 44 (0)771 247 2987
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150611/2be9428d/attachment.html>