[CWG-Stewardship] Service Level Expectations Design Team Template

[Chris Disspain]

You read me right, man ;-)


Cheers,

Chris

On 1 Mar 2015, at 11:35 , Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I think Chris's proposal makes sense too in logically separating:
> 
> a) porting across existing service level obligations to the post-transition environment;
> b) creating the possibility of reviewing and changing them in future; and 
> c) reviewing and updating the substantive content
> 
> If I read him right a) and b) should be done, but c) should not. 
> 
> That might trim the work this design team needs to do and make finalising the names community proposal easier...
> 
> cheers
> Jordan
> 
> 
> On 1 March 2015 at 08:56, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Makes sense to me.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 28-Feb-15 18:43, Chris Disspain wrote:
>> On that basis I wonder whether we would not be better served by accepting the current status quo and building a mechanism for review and negotiated changes to those service levels that could be employed immediately after transition and on an ongoing basis. 
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> 
>  	
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
> www.avast.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jordan Carter
> 
> Chief Executive 
> InternetNZ
> 
> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
> jordan at internetnz.net.nz 
> Skype: jordancarter
> 
> A better world through a better Internet 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150301/200e7ff4/attachment.html>