[CWG-Stewardship] Service Level Expectations Design Team Template

[Jordan Carter]

I've thought of a b/c mid point complication:

It is: whether anything needs to be added to currently documented SLA
standards to allow the transition to be acceptable to any key customer
community.

That's not a wholesale review but it's a little more than b), while
respecting the need for conservatism and efficiency....

Jordan

On Sunday, 1 March 2015, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 to Jordan's specific suggestion as well;  considering that everything
> works just fine right now is an indication that repeating the current SLA
> would at least maintain status quo.
>
> Will be good if that methodology is applied to other design teams as much
> as possible.
> The goal is to build a stronger ICANN and so long as we have a
> multistakeholder means/process to do that, then our job is done.
>
> Cheers!
>
> sent from Google nexus 4
> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> On 1 Mar 2015 01:46, "Chris Disspain" <ceo at auda.org.au
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ceo at auda.org.au');>> wrote:
>
>> You read me right, man ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 1 Mar 2015, at 11:35 , Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jordan at internetnz.net.nz');>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think Chris's proposal makes sense too in logically separating:
>>
>> a) porting across existing service level obligations to the
>> post-transition environment;
>> b) creating the possibility of reviewing and changing them in future; and
>> c) reviewing and updating the substantive content
>>
>> If I read him right a) and b) should be done, but c) should not.
>>
>> That might trim the work this design team needs to do and make finalising
>> the names community proposal easier...
>>
>> cheers
>> Jordan
>>
>>
>> On 1 March 2015 at 08:56, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','avri at acm.org');>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> Makes sense to me.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>> On 28-Feb-15 18:43, Chris Disspain wrote:
>>>
>>> On that basis I wonder whether we would not be better served by
>>> accepting the current status quo and building a mechanism for review and
>>> negotiated changes to those service levels that could be employed
>>> immediately after transition and on an ongoing basis.
>>>
>>>  Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>    <http://www.avast.com/>
>>>
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> www.avast.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship at icann.org');>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jordan Carter
>>
>> Chief Executive
>> *InternetNZ*
>>
>> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)
>> jordan at internetnz.net.nz
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jordan at internetnz.net.nz');>
>> Skype: jordancarter
>>
>> *A better world through a better Internet *
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship at icann.org');>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CWG-Stewardship at icann.org');>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>

-- 
Jordan Carter
Chief Executive, InternetNZ

+64-21-442-649 | jordan at internetnz.net.nz

Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150301/8b47a93e/attachment.html>