[CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

[Jonathan Robinson]

All,

 

I have a detail suggestion on the membership of DTs. I suggest that we
consider the lead as a member and not as an additional "neutral" chair.

e.g. if the DT is nominally composed of a specific number of representatives
from a particular group, then the lead will count as one of the
representatives of his or her group.

 

The rationale being that the lead is (almost by definition) someone who has
an interest in the topic and therefore (possibly) a specific outcome.

Whilst a degree of neutrality is required in order to ensure that the voices
of the members are heard and accounted for, the lead is not per se neutral.

 

As ever, any concerns or issues, flag them. Otherwise, we'll run with this
approach.

 

Jonathan

 

From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info] 
Sent: 09 March 2015 21:50
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

 

All,

 

Please see attached for a status update on the Design Teams in preparation
for our call tomorrow.

 

Lise and I have reviewed the whole DT landscape and the current status is
reflected in the document.

 

Please note that it contains the following:

 

.         A status for each DT per the model of the step-by-step process
which has been referenced in Annex A.

.         A note section as part of the index to provide additional comments
as needed

.         New prospective DTs added 

o   L (IANA Function Separation Mechanism), 

o   M (Escalation mechanisms beyond CSC) and 

o   N (Periodic Review of IANA Functions). 

.         An updated description for .INT DT to match description in draft
transition proposal.

.         An 'expression of interest field', currently only in the
Authorization Function DT-D
(as other expression of interests come in, we'll create the same for other
DTs). 

 

Where a priority is set as final, that is the priority we have agreed. Where
it is provisional, that is indicative pending further detail on the DT
emerging.

 

I look forward to reviewing this with you on the tomorrow.

 

Thanks,

 

Jonathan

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150310/f44a7e5b/attachment.html>