[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - Draft Transition Plan V2.1 and DT Status Overview

[Marika Konings]

Hi Chuck,

Thanks for your feedback. For now the focus has been on identifying the issues that need to be dealt with - I don't think the structure of section III is set in stone, so if the view is that the issues identified and being worked on by DT fit better under a different heading, I don't think that should be an issue. Just my two cents.

Best regards,

Marika

From: <Gomes>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes at verisign.com<mailto:cgomes at verisign.com>>
Date: Wednesday 11 March 2015 20:58
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org<mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>, "cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>>
Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - Draft Transition Plan V2.1 and DT Status Overview

It may be just me or it may because I was mostly out of the loop for a week and a half, but in Section III.A.1 of plan the placement of some of the DT output seems strange to me.  For example:

·         It makes perfect sense to me why DT-L (IANA Function Separation Mechanism) would be in Section III.A.1.1 (Contract extension, cancellation and renewal) but I don't understand why DT-M (Escalation Procedures) would be in the same section;  Wouldn't DT-M be better placed in 'III.A.1.3 Administration/oversight of SOW' or 'III.A.1.4 Statement of Work (SOW)'?

·         Also, why would DT-B (Assessment of the Level of Consensus within the ccTLD Community in Regard to a Possible Appeal Mechanism for ccTLD Delegations and Redelegations) be in 'Section III.A.1.1 (Contract extension, cancellation and renewal)'; in my opinion it would also be better placed in 'III.A.1.3 Administration/oversight of SOW' or 'III.A.1.4 Statement of Work (SOW)'.

Am I missing something here?

Chuck

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:08 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org<mailto:cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] For your review - Draft Transition Plan V2.1 and DT Status Overview

Dear All,

As discussed during yesterday's meeting, please find attached version 2.1 of the draft transition proposal which includes:

  *   References in section 3 to Design Teams
  *   New section covering .INT
  *   Placeholders in section 3 where staff is developing text for CWG review
  *   Some minor other edits

Please share any comments / edits you may have with the list.

For your convenience, you will also find the latest version of the design teams status overview which includes some of the improvements discussed during yesterday's meeting.

Best regards,

Marika
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150311/d6424d1f/attachment.html>