[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - draft transition plan V2.2

Brenden Kuerbis bnkuerbi at syr.edu
Tue Mar 17 16:09:10 UTC 2015


Hi, Marika,

Thanks, please find my comments attached.

-- Brenden


---------------------------------------
Brenden Kuerbis
Post Doctoral Researcher, iSchool, Syracuse University ||
http://internetgovernance.org
<http://internetgovernance.org>

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
wrote:

>  Dear All,
>
>  Please find attached for your review version 2.2. of the draft
> transition plan. Note that in this version:
>
>    - All redline changes from the previous version have been accepted to
>    facilitate review of the new content.
>    - As previously indicated, staff has provided proposed language for
>    sections III.A.1.4.1, III.A.1.4.2 and III.A.1.4.3. Note that we have
>    organised this content using the following approach: 1) Describe background
>    / current state, 2) Describe the issues identified as a result of the
>    transition and rationale for changes, if any, to address the issues
>    identified, 3) Current language / requirements and proposed revised
>    language / requirements. The CWG may want to consider whether it would be
>    helpful if the Design Teams would follow a similar approach as they develop
>    their proposed content for the draft transition proposal as it will
>    facilitate consistency across the document as well as guide DT’s with
>    regard to the information that is expected to be provided by the DT.
>    - A proposed appendix A has been added which outlines the proposed
>    changes to the current requirements for DNSSEC in the Authoritative Root
>    Zone.
>
> We note that comments have been submitted by Andrew in relation to
> sections I and II. Staff is reviewing these comments and will aim to
> incorporate these in the next iteration of the draft proposal, unless there
> are any concerns or comments with regard to the proposed changes (if so,
> please share those with the mailing list).
>
>  To facilitate your review, I’ve attached both a clean and redline
> version.
>
>  Best regards,
>
>  Marika
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150317/d2b0a203/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CWG - Draft Transition Plan V2.2 - redline.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 149523 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150317/d2b0a203/CWG-DraftTransitionPlanV2.2-redline-0001.docx>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list