[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA #30 19 March

[Brenda Brewer]

Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Call #30 - 19 March are available here:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52892457

 


Action Items


Action (all): review proposal 2.2.1 and provide input

Action (all): identify if there are any gaps that are currently not addressed or identified by
design teams

Action (Robert & Cheryl): suggest text to fill out sections 4 and 5 of proposal (Wiki will serve as
basis) 

Action: What is the origin of the text in v.2.2  section III.A.1.1 now and what guidance has NTIA
&/or ICG already issued. 

Action: All DTs aim to produce drafts for F2F by 18:00 UTC Monday

Action (staff): relocate periodic review function and assess where it fits in the Draft proposal

Action (Staff): Add Red Team at end of DT list to examine whether there are any issues with respect
to meeting NTIA's criteria, particularly with respect to security and stability and prevention of
capture. This is a particular form of stress testing

Action (Martin): complete discussion on Principles on mailing list (including 7.ii. and footnote 1)

Action (Avri): CCWG issues for the CWG - identify whether there are any additional items (see also
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c4Eab_fZMCQeeYvhy8OcE6f_PqhGza2qW4-UgFn8Pvc/edit?usp=sharing)  

Action: Add Red Team to the list in the next iternation as DT O.

Action: Design Teams to review guidance document and see if there are elements that could help
inform deliberations. 


Notes


Note: roll call will be taken from Adobe Connect

1. Opening Remarks

Timeline to be assessed after F2F meeting in Istanbul - target is to publish draft proposal for
public comment by early April.

2. Proposal 2.2.1

Minor revisions made to address comments received. Work in progress - any input welcome, including
orientation of DT in proposal itself. Some working assumptions have been made in this document, but
these will be updated to reflect the proposed recommendations by the DT once agreed by the CWG. 

3. Design Teams

Input to be provided by Monday at 18.00 UTC for consideration in Istanbul. Draft template has been
provided to facilitate content development by design teams. Expression of interest for priority 2 DT
will be recorded, but those DT are not active yet. 

DT-L Update

Progressing at pace. Work is being phased - working on phase 1 (looking at existing documents) and 2
(building on existing documents and define what may be needed). Two DIDP requests have been filed
for documents that are currently referenced in the IANA Functions Contract. May be linkage with DT G
concerning intellectual property. 

DT-A Update

The DT hopes to publish its recommendations over the weekend. No further updates at this stage.

DT-B Update

Survey will go out soon to ccTLD community. No further updates at this stage.

DT-C Update

Document expected to be circulated by Monday's deadline.

DT-D Update

Excellent exchanges on the email list. DT now to capture those conversations in the content template
in view of being able to share it with the CWG by Monday's deadline.  

DT-E Update

Initial review of SAC 69 prepared by staff to be circulated to CWG. This may be similar to red team
assignment or this work can be used by the red team as a starting point?

DT-F Update

A few volunteers have come forward, Rudi Vansnick has volunteered to be the lead. Grace working with
DT on next steps. 

DT-M Update

Guidance paper circulated by Chris Disspain contains a number of suggestions in relation to
escalation mechanisms. DT M is using that as a kick-off point. 

DT-N Update

Question of what is being reviewed has still not been clarified - is it just the SOW or the IANA
Function as a whole. Dependent to a certain extent on the SOW, but work could already commence on
those areas that are not dependent on the SOW. DT may also want to review the guidance document as
it may provide a starting point. Should there be another team that would work on the review of the
IANA Function? DT to work on scope and chairs to consider whether it should be one or two design
team - shouldn't prevent DT to work on SOW review as currently defined in the draft proposal. See
latest draft of scoping template at
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pjRsvePXLHrK0zzFmMcavzvSXehds5FTCEUPPcc7K6w/edit?usp=sharing>
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pjRsvePXLHrK0zzFmMcavzvSXehds5FTCEUPPcc7K6w/edit?usp=sharing

Action: Add Red Team to the list in the next iternation as DT O. 

Action: Design Teams to review guidance document and see if there are elements that could help
inform deliberations. 

4. Update from Client Committee (Greg)

Sidley has provided first draft response to 12 questions that were provided in the legal scoping
document which has been circulated to the client committee and the CWG. Client committee will meet
later today. Work is currently being done by Sidley, hence 'quietness' on the client committee
mailing list. Substantive discussion expected to take place in Istanbul. 

5. F2F Agenda and Logistics 

Draft agenda has been circulated - will be work in progress as output of DT is processes as well as
possible additional input from Sidley. Calendar invites, including RP details will be circulated
shortly. 

6. AOB

7. Closing Remarks

No meeting scheduled for next Tuesday. 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150319/22de06e1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150319/22de06e1/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150319/22de06e1/smime-0001.p7s>