[CWG-Stewardship] RySG IANA Statement

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi Stephanie,

Thanks for this great share, I think it's good to note that there was no
request to have respective SO/AC formerly present a statement of view
before face 2 face so I do hope that the CWG won't hold this against those
who haven't made a formal statement. It would have also been very useful to
have statement like this made early enough to help maximise the time and
provide some guidance. Nevertheless it's better late than never.

That said, having read through the document VERY briefly, I largely agree
with most of the views/recommendations made except the one that touch on
the stakeholder that decides whether there is need to move the IANA
function to another operator. My personal view is that such decision should
not be left to the so-called direct customers alone; It should rather be on
consensus basis across the stakeholders.

On a lighter note, it's good to note that the document referred to ICANN as
the "current" IANA operator. (Hopefully this would help inform Greg, as the
principle document gets finalised).

I am no longer certain of my physical presence in Istanbul but will be sure
to follow happenings remotely just incase.

Looking forward to a focused, goal based and rewarding 2 days of CWG
meeting.

Regards
sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 22 Mar 2015 15:27, "Duchesneau, Stephanie" <
Stephanie.Duchesneau at neustar.us> wrote:

>  Hi All,
>
>
>
> With the face-to-face meeting coming up the gTLD Registry participants in
> the CWG have taken the opportunity to identify shared positions on the IANA
> Stewardship Transition and the current work of the CWG, and to solicit
> wider feedback from the RySG.
>
>
>
> The attached statement was prepared by gTLD members participating in this
> working group with input and support from the wider Registries Stakeholder
> Group. Though no formal vote was taken, all feedback received was
> constructive and supportive of the statement. It is meant as a follow-on to
> the RySG comments provided on the Draft IANA proposal, taking into account
> additional work and developments since December.
>
>
>
> We hope you’ll take the time to review the statement in advance of the
> Istanbul meeting and that it provides useful clarity into concerns and
> recommendations of gTLD Registry representatives participating in this
> work.
>
>
>
> Please do not hesitate to raise any questions or responses.
>
>
>
> Best, and safe travels to all heading to Istanbul.
>
>
>
> Stephanie
>
>
>
> *Stephanie Duchesneau*
> *Neustar, Inc. / *Public Policy Manager
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20006
> *Office:* +1.202.533.2623 *Mobile: *+1.703.731.2040  *Fax: *
> +1.202.533.2623 */* www.neustar.biz
>   ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this email message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this email message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150322/6c6354a1/attachment-0001.html>