[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA F2F Day 2 Session 8 | 27 March

[Brenda Brewer]

Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Face to Face Day 2 Session 8 Meeting on 27
March are available here:   <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52893304>
Session 8

 


Action Items


*        Action (Lise): set a deadline for Principles

*        Action (Sidley team): looking at the internal models (functional separation and legal
separation) with focus on the entity which is the IANA functions. 
>From there, look into what the implementation possibilities /requirements are. Focus on the
diversity of the gTLD and ccTLD legacies. 

*        Action: Cheryl and Alan to work this out

*        Action (members): go back to their chartering org and explain the timeline and the short
form/ long form proposal 

*        Action (staff): look at lessons learned for document management from PC in Policy and
Implementation WG


Notes


Question to consider during the break

What are the fundamental issues that we are trying to solve for?

Are we or can we converge around a solution? Is there something around which we can converge? 

Comments: 

*         

*	Suggest that external is put to the side for now, and that the integrated/hybrid model be
brought forward
*	Look at this from perspective of stability and continuity is important and may lead to
hybrid model
*	With hybrid, we are taking the bet on enhancing ICANN's accountability, and if we lose that
bet, then it should be lost publically. Contract Co. is 
hedging against that bet. 
*	Registries would like to explore the internal solutions further
*	A proposal that Sidley look into the Hybrid model and Contract Co. model 
*	There are a lot of similarities in the internal models -- would like for Sidley to look at
those
*	We got input on the Contract Co. model from our Public Comment in December 2014
*	Would not communicate that we have eliminated Contract Co. 
*	How do we fill in the gaps in the Hybrid model? Perhaps Sidley can assist with that
*	Contract Co. may have ideas to contribute to Hybrid
*	Sidley can help us understand how we institutionalize the link with the CCWG-Acct work
(Sidley is working with both groups)
*	Consider the broader community (the GAC, the WSIS+10 review, etc)

Chair's summary: 

We don't want to pre-empt a decision, but we want a focus

There are still details to iron out

Sidley will focus on internal models 

We are working closely with CCWG-acct and are perhaps even giving them more direction for their work
with our focus

Action (Lise): set a deadline for Principles

Action (Sidley team): looking at the internal models (functional separation and legal separation)
with focus on the entity which is the IANA functions. From there, look into what the implementation
possibilities /requirements are. Focus on the diversity of the gTLD and ccTLD legacies. 

Design Team Status Update

*         

*        DTA -- prefer before 10 April

*        DTB is in progress (survey ends on 3 April)

*        DTC has a lot of work to do before 10 April

*        DTD is changing its purpose to move the considerations to DTF

Action: Cheryl and Alan to work this out

*         

*        DTE is complete and will be submitted to Red team

*        DTF -- Alan is lead 

*        DTL -- waiting on some requested documents

*        DTM may need to revisit considering CCWG output

*        DTN will take guidance and registries document for as input

*        DTO -- needs a lead

*        Red Team will be staff led 

Thank you DTs for all the good work

Timeline

Compiled by Berry Cobb

Main changes: 

*         

*	Public Comment is shifted back to 20 April
*	High intensity to prepare for public comment is moved to 13-14 April
*	Translation is important 
*	Public Comment may require special device with specific questions (part of the structured
for discussed) 
*	Structured PC makes the analysis more accurate and easier to do.
*	Risk factor of community concensus remains -- members must do their best to communicate back
with their groups consistently so that there are no surprises

Action (members): go back to their chartering org and explain the timeline and the short form/ long
form proposal 

Action (staff): look at lessons learned for document management from PC in Policy and Implementation
WG

Key Dates

*        10 April - deadline for DTs to provide content

*        13-14 Intensive working days - Preparing final proposal

*        20 Apr (Monday) - Start of Public Comment for 30 days

*        20 May (Wednesday) - Close of Public Comment

-        - - Review public Comments / Continue Proposal Development - -

*        30 May (Saturday) - High-Intensity weekend

*        08 Jun (Monday) - Deliver Names Proposal to SOs/ACs

*        25 Jun (Thursday) - Deliver Names Proposal to ICG

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150327/9a0527c8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 92 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150327/9a0527c8/image001-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150327/9a0527c8/smime-0001.p7s>