[CWG-Stewardship] Thanks

[Jonathan Robinson]

Thank-you Chris and all who contributed to the hard work.


Lise & I are working on a Chair’s statement and plan to publish it for Monday.

 

Jonathan

 

From: Chris Disspain [mailto:ceo at auda.org.au] 
Sent: 27 March 2015 17:21
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Thanks

 

Lise, Jonathan,

 

Thank you, Holly and Sharon, and the staff for all of your hard work to produce an incredibly successful 2 days of CWG meetings. Thanks to your guidance we have made extraordinary progress. Kudos. 

Chris Disspain

CEO - auDA


On 28 Mar 2015, at 02:13, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org> wrote:

<image001.gif>

Dear all, 

 

The notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Face to Face Day 2 Session 7 Meeting on 27 March are available here:   <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52893302> Session 7

 


Notes


Overarching concerns that affect all models : 

·        legacy of TLD contracting or not (diversity of community idea)

·        Continuity of service (staffing) 

Review & test models (continued)

Focus: what are the objectives and constraints?

At the point of transition, the functions will be with ICANN and the job of this group and the CCWG-Acct is to ensure that we can be satisfied with that. Eventually, there needs to be possibility for separation if required. 

We are using the term "stewardship" interchangeably, but the term means different things depending on context (NTIA is steward for DNS)

Internal and external models are about how the separation of the names function is managed if needed. 

A stewardship problem is different than a competency problem

At some point, there is a need to discuss MRT and whether that is needed or not (for internal, ICANN may have the structure in place)

Comments from Sidley

There is a lot of work to be done to understand the models and the 'teeth' that their mechanisms may provide

Sidley is well positioned to help carve this out. Could do with 3, but is much harder. Would prefer fewer or a priority. 

Question to consider during the break

What are the fundamental issues that we are trying to solve for?

Are we or can we converge around a solution? Is there something around which we can converge?

 

 

_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150328/29826da6/attachment.html>