[CWG-Stewardship] Responses to ICG Questions

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello Grace, all

Thanks for the share and thanks to those that populated the responses as
well. Just 1 minor comment/clarification; considering that .ARPA is for
special purposes, one would expect that there are independent monitoring
process that already exist so I was thinking it would be appropriate not to
have it included in CSC/IFR processes.

It may be good to follow-up with IAB on this (unless one would assume they
are reading this and as such are fine with it)

Regards



On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:13 AM, Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Following the call today, Marika and I have reviewed the responses to the
> ICG Questions and prepared a redline and clean version for your review. We
> received some text from Alan Greenberg for the RZM questions and some text
> from Donna Austin for the .ARPA/CSC question. To summarize our edits,
> please refer to the notes from the call:
>
> *3. ICG Questions - review of draft responses*
>
>    - ICG sent two batches of questions which are presented in the
>    document on screen. CWG has already provided answers to questions.
>    - On RZM question #1: ICG misunderstood the NTIA/Versign proposal.
>    - On RZM question #2: we have a Standing Panel to approve substantial
>    changes. So the answer includes, community consultation, expert
>    consultation, and Board approval. Refer to paragraph 155 in the CWG
>    Proposal (1155 in the ICG). *Alan Greenberg: *Proposed reply to
>    Question 2: Both descriptions are correct but incomplete. The full answer
>    is addressed in paragraph ICG 1155 (CWG 155). A change in the
>    responsibilities of the IANA Functions Operator and the Root Zone
>    Maintainer is  clearly a substantial architectual and operational change,
>    and is therefore subject to a review of the standing review committee and
>    ultimately ICANN Board approval. Subsection 5 of paragraph 155/1155
>    requires consultation through an ICANN Public Comment Process.
>    - On ccTLD questions #3, #4, #5: These were drafted by the ccTLD
>    members/participants. No comments or concerns. Thank you ccTLD
>    members/participants.
>    - On PTI question #6: complete. no comments
>    - On PTI question #7: Clarify text referring to "Community Mechanism"
>    since the CCWG-Accountability is currently working this out. Additional
>    clarfications listed in action item.
>    - On PTI question #8: no comments other than cross-checking with
>    implementation.
>    - On PTI question #9: PTI Board is responsible, but there is also
>    recourse to the ICANN Board. Confirm with lawyers
>    - On questions #10, #11, #12 on scope: no comments
>    - On question #13: representative of IAB or appointed person will be
>    involved in process.
>
>
> *Summary of current status on ICG questions*
>
>    - Further work needed on questions #1, #2, #7, #9, #13
>    - Provisionally closed questions: #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #10, #11, #12
>
> ACTIONS
>
>    - *Action*(staff): update Question #1 text on RZM with latest sent to
>    list (by Alan)
>    - *Action*(staff): update question #2 per notes
>    - *Action*(staff): incorporate Christopher's input (and any other
>    input received) where appropriate
>    - *Action*(staff): Clarify text referring to "Community Mechanism"
>    (perhaps by capitalizing the word Mechanism to refer to structure and by
>    making a direct reference to the CCWG-Accountability). Add "in the event
>    that there is divergence between the Board and the Community on an IFR
>    decision/recommendation, the Community will be able to rely on other
>    mechanisms that are being developed by the CCWG."
>    - *Action*(staff): update question #9 to include recourse to ICANN
>    Board.
>    - *Action*(Chairs): run updated answer to question #9 by the lawyers
>    - *Action*(staff): staff to draft response to #13
>
>
> Best,
> Grace
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20151002/843f7fd3/attachment.html>