[CWG-Stewardship] CWG response on .ARPA (Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Questions from the ICG)

[Andrew Sullivan]

On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:37:27AM +0100, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Some time ago, I was saying that responding to the ICG question related to
> .ARPA in the manner we did may not be appropriate. Below is a draft
> response of CRISP that clearly prefers that it's related .ARPA strings be
> immune of CSC/IFR processes.

The CRISP proposal is not about ARPA but about IN-ADDR.ARPA and
IP6.ARPA.  Those are different zones.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com