[CWG-Stewardship] CWG response on .ARPA (Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Questions from the ICG)

[Seun Ojedeji]

Well I did not say its all about .ARPA as i correlated my statement with
"related strings" but does your statement removes the fact that IP6.ARPA or
URN.ARPA are second level string (domains) of .ARPA (which is the first
level domain). What happens to IP6.ARPA if .ARPA is no longer in existence
due to whatever decision that is made by CSC/IFR?

Regards

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 07:37:27AM +0100, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> > Some time ago, I was saying that responding to the ICG question related
> to
> > .ARPA in the manner we did may not be appropriate. Below is a draft
> > response of CRISP that clearly prefers that it's related .ARPA strings be
> > immune of CSC/IFR processes.
>
> The CRISP proposal is not about ARPA but about IN-ADDR.ARPA and
> IP6.ARPA.  Those are different zones.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------





*Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:      http://www.fuoye.edu.ng
<http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email:
<http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
<seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*

Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20151008/68f5d4f9/attachment.html>