[CWG-Stewardship] CWG response on .ARPA (Fwd: Re: [NRO-IANAXFER] Questions from the ICG)

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Oct 8 22:50:30 UTC 2015


Milton,

My point exactly.

Greg

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Mueller, Milton L <
milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu> wrote:

>
>
> Is there any reason to believe, even in a wild scenario, that the CSC or
> an IFR has the remit, authority or jurisdiction to remove (or even
> recommend the removal) of a TLD (.ARPA or otherwise) from the root?
>
>
>
> I assume that Greg at least understands the proposal well enough to pose
> this as a rhetorical question.
>
> But in case anyone else is confused, the answer is short and simple: No.
>
> The existence of a TLD  in the root is a policy decision my within the
> ICANN or iETF processes, CSC and IFR review only the performance of the
> IANA in implementing those decisions.
>
>
>
> Dr. Milton L. Mueller
>
> Professor, School of Public Policy
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20151008/516f3811/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list