[CWG-Stewardship] SLE update - ICANN seeks to delay SLE Accountability reporting......

[Gomes, Chuck]

Andrew,

Are you suggesting that the transition happen without revised SLEs?

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 12:04 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] SLE update - ICANN seeks to delay SLE Accountability reporting......

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:42:33PM +0000, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
> Andrew
> If I am not mistaken, this is a settled issue. Did this group decide to revise the SLE or did it not? I am under the impression that it did. It undermines the process when people try to use snafus to reinsert a non-consensus position into the outcome.
> 

I'm not trying to insert anything.  My reading of Annex H is that the text says that the plan is part of implementation and is running in parallel.  Therefore, if it takes a few more months, it's not the end of the world; and we can proceed with the transition without it being completely sorted.  What am I misreading?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship