[CWG-Stewardship] SLE update - ICANN seeks to delay SLE Accountability reporting......

[Gomes, Chuck]

Thanks for the clarification Andrew.

My understanding is that the purpose of testing was to validate that proposed SLEs are reasonably achievable.  I suppose that could occur after the transition but what is to prevent it from taking a very long time or not happening at all.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 2:40 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] SLE update - ICANN seeks to delay SLE Accountability reporting......

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 06:26:00PM +0000, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> Are you suggesting that the transition happen without revised SLEs?

It seems to me that, if the SLEs are left exactly the same as they are with only a change in who monitors them, it's not a change that anyone at IANA could possibly buck.

If instead at the same time the transition happens IANA also has to make different commitments as to what it will monitor and what the targets will be, they have a reason to be cautious.

That's all I was saying.  From the response, it sounds like I'm in the rough, but it seems to me that if IANA has a problem achieving these new requirements then we do too.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship