[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - draft responses to ICG Questions

[Alan Greenberg]

Regarding the first item on the Verisign/ICANN proposal:

To quote from an analysis I did for the ALAC Transition Support group:

>The document is an implementation of the implied recommendation of 
>Design Team F that nothing be changed in the RZMS code prior to or 
>during transition. It follows the golden rule that you should make 
>as few changes at the same time as possible.
>
>In my mind, this proposal carried that rule to a ridiculous extreme.

The proposal calls for an lot of work and expense to avoid making a 
relatively simple coding change that could be verified seventeen ways 
to Sunday. But yes, it does meeting the CWG requirements.

Alan


At 29/09/2015 09:57 AM, Marika Konings wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>In order to facilitate the development of responses to the ICG 
>Questions, staff has, in co-ordination with the chairs, prepared the 
>attached table which provides a draft response for a number of the 
>ICG questions which is intended to serve as a starting point for 
>CWG-Stewardship deliberations. Please review this document and share 
>your feedback with the mailing list, if possible, prior to the 
>CWG-Stewardship meeting on Thursday.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Marika
>
>_______________________________________________
>CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship