[CWG-Stewardship] For your review - draft responses to ICG Questions

[Jaap Akkerhuis]

 Alan Greenberg writes:

 > Regarding the first item on the Verisign/ICANN proposal:
 > 
 > To quote from an analysis I did for the ALAC Transition Support group:
 > 
 > >The document is an implementation of the implied recommendation of 
 > >Design Team F that nothing be changed in the RZMS code prior to or 
 > >during transition. It follows the golden rule that you should make 
 > >as few changes at the same time as possible.
 > >
 > >In my mind, this proposal carried that rule to a ridiculous extreme.
 > 
 > The proposal calls for an lot of work and expense to avoid making a 
 > relatively simple coding change that could be verified seventeen ways 
 > to Sunday. But yes, it does meeting the CWG requirements.

Agreed, it is just a proposal for testing the communication lines.

	jaap