[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [Iana-ipr] IANA IPR - Proposed resolution of selected legal issues

[Seun Ojedeji]

Thanks for this share Jonathan and thanks to everyone that worked on this.
Bullet point 2 of termination agreement and the CCG consultation process
summary (item 5) seem to have addressed my concerns.

That said, on bullet point 3 under "maintenance of IPR"section, I think it
may be neater for the licensee (ICANN) to always be the one requesting new
addition/making payments. Secondly (not a lawyer) it's not yet clear how
new registrations gets licenced to the licensee i.e will it be automatic or
via certain process. I expect that is going to be addressed in the main
document drafting.

Looking forward to see the actual wordings to be inline with that summary.

Regards
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 3 Aug 2016 11:05 p.m., "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson at afilias.info>
wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> We have held two length meetings this week to deal with the various issues
> around the IANA IPR.
>
>
>
> Late today (at least in Europe), the three operational community IPR group
> has reviewed a set of proposed key compromises (attached) proposed in order
> to deal with IANA IPR being housed in the IETF Trust.
>
>
>
> We will review these key points in the appropriate section of the agenda
> tomorrow and hopefully make it clear why and how these have been arrived at.
>
>
>
> Thank-you,
>
>
>
> Jonathan (together with Greg & Lise who are the other two CWG
> representatives in the IANA IPR group)
>
>
>
> *From:* Jorge Contreras [mailto:contreraslegal at att.net]
> *Sent:* 03 August 2016 01:37
> *To:* iana-ipr at nro.net
> *Subject:* [Iana-ipr] IANA IPR - Proposed resolution of selected legal
> issues
>
>
>
> Colleagues,
>
>
>
> As promised during yesterday’s conference call, Josh and I have discussed
> some of the the legal “sticking points” in the IANA IPR Community Agreement
> and License Agreement.
>
>
>
> The attached document reflects our joint proposal to resolve these issues
> in a manner that, we hope, will be satisfactory to all of the parties.
>
>
>
> We look forward to discussing these points during tomorrow’s call, along
> with any other issues that the parties wish to raise.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> Jorge L. Contreras
>
> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
>
> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
>
> Washington, DC 20036
>
> contreraslegal at att.net
>
>
>
> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and
> confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this
> message immediately.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160804/0af2893b/attachment.html>