[CWG-Stewardship] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016

[Gomes, Chuck]

Jonathan/Lise,

You are probably ahead of me but, if there is time in our CWG call this week, it might be a good idea to discuss Kavouss's comments.  Allowing the 'experts' to respond to his comments and other CWG members to discuss as well might help although I am not sure he will easily concede.  It would at least document the discussion in a very visible way.

I of course will respect your decision on how to handle this.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Arasteh
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 12:46 PM
To: Jari Arkko
Cc: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CWG-Stewardship] Revised Community Agreement Draft: 08-05-2016

Dear Jari
I have made many comments during public comment period for CCWG. Non of them were consulted???  

Sent from my iPhone

> On 8 Aug 2016, at 18:44, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko at piuha.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> That does not mean that my comments be ignored
> 
> No, of course not. What I said was that we have more time to consider additional comments during the public comment period.
> 
> Jari
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
CWG-Stewardship mailing list
CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship