[CWG-Stewardship] IRP Informational call (tomorrow) Wednesday at 22:00 UTC

[Grace Abuhamad]

Dear CWG, 

In Jonathan email below, he suggests a call to review the IRP
recommendations later this week. However, to keep with the CCWG timeline ‹
comments on the IRP text are due Thursday at 02:00 UTC ‹ we will host this
call on Wednesday at 22:00 UTC (tomorrow). We realize this is short notice,
but we have confirmed availability from both Becky Burr, the lead in the
CCWG on this issue, and Sharon Flanagan, who will be providing the CWG with
an assessment of the requirements.

Brenda will be sending the invite shortly. Please refer to me email earlier
today for IRP documents:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/2016-February/004704.html

‹Grace

From:  <cwg-client-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Jonathan Robinson
<jrobinson at afilias.info>
Organization:  Afilias
Reply-To:  Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson at afilias.info>
Date:  Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 10:06 AM
To:  "cwg-stewardship at icann.org" <cwg-stewardship at icann.org>
Cc:  Client Committee <cwg-client at icann.org>
Subject:  [client com] FW: Client Com notes

All,
 
Following on from what was agreed at the most recent CWG meeting of Thursday
last week, the CWG Client Committee met yesterday together with
representatives from Sidley Austin.
 
Please see below for the key outcomes. The most urgent being the first.
 
Thank-you.
 
Jonathan 
For and on behalf of the CWG Stewardship Client Committee
 
---
 
On CCWG Accountability and CWG Dependencies
 
Sidley has been involved in certification of both the previous
CCWG-Accountability drafts. We would like to confirm with the CWG that
Sidley will conduct a review of the requirements in the final drafting
stages, before sign-off by the CWG.
To do this, Sharon from Sidley will need to familiarize herself with the
latest CWG/CCWG discussions, especially on the budget and IRP compromises.
If you do have any significant concerns with this, please let them be known
ASAP
 
A schedule / process for dealing with this is proposed as follows:
 
Considering that our next CWG meeting may be too far ahead of the CCWG¹s
finalisation schedule, we suggest adjustments to the CWG schedule, Sharon¹s
schedule permitting, as follows:
-       Sharon will join the DT-O call on Tuesday 9 February at 20:00 UTC
for an explanation and update on the discussion regarding the budget
requirement. If she is unable to join, we will make sure to pass along the
recording and transcript.

-       We will organize a special CWG-Sidley call to explain and discuss
how the CCWG is implementing the IRP requirement. This call will take place
on Thursday or Friday this week, to be scheduled based on a Doodle poll.

 
On Bylaws
 
Sidley¹s view is that the bulk of the work will be completed once they have
reviewed our answers to their questions and integrated these into their
draft. They feel strongly that it make sense and will be most cost-effective
to keep the document whole and to not slim it down prior to having the full
scope and content included. Therefore the next steps proposed are as
follows:
 
-       The CWG continues work on responses needed for Bylaws matrix

-       The CWG shares draft responses with Sidley for review only. Sidley
will remain in review-mode, and not implement the responses until both sides
are satisfied with the detail of the responses provided).

-       Once responses are final, Sidley embeds the responses into the
Bylaws matrix.

-       The Client Committee will review the Bylaws matrix to ensure that
the work is consistent with the CWG¹s responses.

-       The matrix is then shared with ICANN for an opportunity to
review/comment on the CWG-Sidley Bylaws matrix before the next step.

-       ICANN assists with the organization/structure of the Bylaws in their
final form, including assisting with moving parts of the Sidley detail into
external reference documents (annexes, etc).
This will be done in coordination with the CWG.

 
 
CWG Meetings
 
Our next call is scheduled for 18 February, but we are likely postpone this
call to the following week (25 February). It is important at this stage to
focus our efforts on the CCWG dependencies. Please look for a re-scheduling
notice from Brenda.
 
 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160209/2bd1b742/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160209/2bd1b742/smime-0001.p7s>