[CWG-Stewardship] 答复: RZERC member qualification criteria

Sivasubramanian M isolatedn at gmail.com
Fri Jul 22 09:02:55 UTC 2016


I am sorry I missed the meeting, but who are the appointing organizations
and how many members in total?

Thank you.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I do expect that the appointing organization should have a
> higher(definite) say in her appointee. Hence, i think the requirement
> should just be stated as a "compelling" expectation from the appointing org
> and not as a compulsion to them. A rewording similar to below may be
> appropriate:
>
> "Its expected that appointees to the RZERC would have general
> understanding of the ICANN Root Zone, and will adequately represent their
> respective appointing organization's particular interest.
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Peter Green <
> seekcommunications at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The same question as Andrew pointed out.
>>
>>
>> How to define "have a strong overall understanding of the Root Zone"?
>>
>> Does that mean the Appointee must be a technical guy who is specialized
>> in Root Zone work?
>>
>>
>> How to evaluate if a Appointee could "fully represent their appointing
>> organization's particular interest in the Root Zone"?
>>
>> Does that mean the Appointee must be from a registry who owns gTLD
>> strings which have been delegated into the Root Zone?
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Peter Green
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *发件人:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org <
>> cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org> 代表 Andrew Sullivan <
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
>> *发送时间:* 2016年7月22日 14:34
>> *收件人:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
>> *主题:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] RZERC member qualification criteria
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:18:11PM +0000, Yuko Green wrote:
>> >
>> > *         Appointees to the RZERC must have a strong overall
>> understanding of the Root Zone, and must be able to fully represent their
>> appointing organization's particular interest in the root zone.
>> >
>>
>> How is this criterion evaluated?  What would happen if an organization
>> appointed someone to the RZERC and some other organization disagreed
>> about that person's qualification?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> A
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>> CWG-Stewardship Info Page - mm.icann.org
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship>
>> mm.icann.org
>> To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the
>> CWG-Stewardship Archives. Using CWG-Stewardship: To post a message to all
>> the list ...
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb:
> http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt
> email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng
> <seun.ojedeji at fuoye.edu.ng>*
>
> Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
>


-- 
Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160722/34e25d49/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list